In the early 1990's, just as CD's were displacing vinyl records, the music industry came up with two more formats: mini-cd's and DAT (digital audio tape). Both offered some major benefits. The mini CD's cut down on bulk, both for the recording and the playback device, and the DAT, at least to people with the acute hearing of a bat, a better sound. Both of these otherwise promising technologies failed in a very big way for one simple reason: America had just made a major upgrade in both hardware and software by going from vinyl to CD. They simply were not going to do that again. Or at least not that soon.
Fast forward to the introduction of home-based 3D television at CES just a few years ago. The country had just begun its massive conversion to flat-screen...which, for the most part came equipped with HD without having to do anything else. It's easy to understand why all the TV manufacturers would salivate at the chance to sell all their new flat-screen buyers an additional TV or two. But why would any consumer, having spent between $400 and $2,500 to upgrade their viewing experience essentially toss that investment away for the privilege of spending even more money for something that gave them so marginal a return and made them wear funny glasses. (And who were those consumers? Probably not the same ones who gravitated to the 3D intensive shoot-em-ups in the first place.)
The consumer, as usual, voted with their wallets. I do wonder what those consumer electronics wizards were thinking.